Two Egyptian heart-scarabs, both connected to the city of Cefalù, are presented here: the first one, at Palermo, Museo Archeologico Regionale, was published in 1942 by E. Bacchi, as one of the few heart-scarabs found outside Egypt, on the rock of Cefalù. Its text has been checked and some new readings are proposed. Inscribed for a Chantress of Bastet, it shows a peculiar decoration on the first register, looking like a lunette, then the traditional beginning of Chapter 30B of the Book of the Dead, typical for heart-scarabs, combined with a rare variant. It had remained a unicum until July 2020, when a parallel in the Berlin Museum came to our knowledge, and this is published here as well: the same decoration in the first register and the same text, although shorter. Mainly on the base of prosopographical data, a date to the Twenty-second Dynasty seems appropriate for the Berlin scarab, and consequently for the one in Palermo, which could even belong to a member of the same family. The owner of the scarab in Berlin shows a set of priestly titles that are typical of Per-Sopdu/Saft el-Henna, which therefore may be an indication of its origin. The second “Sicilian” scarab, held at Cefalù itself in the collection of Enrico Pirajno Baron of Mandralisca, after whom the Museum is named, is unpublished. Its owner was another Chantress, serving Amun-Re, and nearly contemporary: it is to be dated to the early Third Intermediate Period, Twenty-first – Twenty-second Dynasty. In the Appendix at the end, notes and remarks on the provenance of the two scarabs in Sicily, documenting mainly the discovery of the Palermo scarab.
Two of the heart-scarabs presented here are both connected to the city of Cefalù: one is from Cefalù itself, having been discovered there, and is therefore one of the few specimens found outside of Egypt or Nubia; the other is held in Cefalù. The first one is published, but its text has been checked and a revised version is presented here. The second one is unpublished.
When this paper was nearly ready for submission, the authors chanced on a parallel for the first scarab in a still unpublished heart-scarab in the Berlin
This article was written by both authors in close cooperation. Gloria Rosati coordinated the work, personally examined the two scarabs in Sicily1 and researched their provenance. In the present study, she was mainly concerned with the translation and commentary of the texts. Claude Laroche found the Berlin Museum parallel, wrote the descriptions of the scarabs and was mainly concerned with dating issues, particularly as regards the Berlin scarab.
1. Museo Archeologico Regionale “Antonino Salinas”, Palermo, inv. no. 18405
Dimensions: 71 x 51 x 28 mm; weight: 168.09 g.
Material: dark green stone (peridotite ?),2 with a thin black vein.
Provenance: found at the end of 1939 or beginning of 1940 on the rock of Cefalù. Reported as a fortuitous find not far away from, but at a lower level than, the so-called Tempio di Diana.3
This well-preserved heart-scarab was published, soon after its discovery, by a young collaborator and pupil of Giulio Farina’s, Ernesta Bacchi, as an addition at the end of her article concerning a heart-scarab bearing the name of Thutmosis IV in the Turin Museum and reported to come from Sardinia.4
Its profile is a subrectangular oval. Its schematic, parallelepiped-shaped legs are separated by grooves of medium depth and decorated with parallel lines. The clypeus, which would have had several indentations, is damaged and now shows only one. The cheeks are decorated with striations and the elytra with two notches in the shape of a shield. It seems that the prothorax is decorated by a half circle that we call a “circular crown”, which however is barely visible. The suture between the prothorax and the elytra is represented by a double line engraved in a shape between U and V, and the one separating the elytra by three parallel lines extended at the rear end of the scarab by small concentric triangles.
On the base – a small part of whose edge is chipped – a text is engraved in seven lines and a lunette at the top, which contains the image of Anubis as a recumbent jackal. Because of the representation of this god and the content of the text, which combines the beginning of Chapter 30B of the Book of the Dead and an uncommon variant, this scarab appeared as a unicum in a corpus of the 1600 heart amulets inventoried in 128 museums and private collections by one of the authors of the present article,5 until an unpublished parallel was discovered in July 2020, as explained below.
In spite of its near uniqueness and peculiar circumstances of discovery, there seems to be no reason to doubt the authenticity of the object. It is a scarab of beautiful workmanship, and well-preserved, notwithstanding the chipping of the clypeus and the edge of the base, and the wear of the text. It has a parallel in the above-mentioned heart-scarab bearing the name of Thutmosis IV, in Turin,6 which, oddly enough, was also reported to come from outside Egypt, having been found at Tharros in Sardinia.7 Bacchi indicated as a parallel another Turin scarab,
1.2 The inscription
Ernesta Bacchi was probably able to read the inscription on the scarab’s base working from photographs only, or casts. Indeed, photos of it were taken soon after its discovery, and molds made, both with sealing-wax and plaster. For some reason, perhaps technical ones, her transcription, however, is here and there more of a mere transcription than a true copy of the inscription; in particular, the position of a few signs is different than on the original.
The hieroglyphic inscription is very lightly incised, as well as worn and chipped along the edge. Nevertheless, it is illegible only in a few places.
The text (Fig. 2) consists of seven lines and a sort of small lunette on top, an unusual feature indeed. It is interesting to mention that one of the two heart scarabs belonging to Osorkon II from the Twenty-second Dynasty, kept at the Brooklyn Museum,10 is, besides this one (and its Berlin parallel, discussed below), the only heart scarab in the corpus so far collected11 to be decorated in the first register (the goddess Maat, a phoenix and a fan). One could also mention, for comparison’s sake, the “layout” of the text inscribed in an oval inserted in a pectoral, above a winged scarab,12 but this text is not a regular heart-chapter text. There in the lunette on top, two winged snakes flank the akhet-sign, then six inscribed lines follow, with the owner’s name, the beginning of a hetep-di-nesu-formula on his behalf, and at the end some words probably recalling the beginning of Chapter BD 30B.
Anubis as a recumbent jackal is in the middle of the lunette, looking right, with a band tied around his neck; in front of the god, the figure of a heart; above and behind the god, the hieroglyphic caption:
“Anubis, who is in the embalming-placea”.
The heart is a little larger than the other hieroglyphic signs and is not a part of the caption: it is certainly the image of the owner’s heart in front of Anubis, the god in charge of the weighing.13 Bacchi did not copy the sign, although it is quite clear; in a cast, however, it could have looked like a chipped place.
“She saysa: “My ib-heart, (my?b) ib-heart of my motherc, (my) haty-heart|2 of (my) transformations, come to the <Beautiful> Placed!” She shall be examinede on the scalesf and she shall be foundg |3 righth in the Hall of the Double Justice. Her |4 mouth shall be given back to her together with her eyes, her heart (haty) being firm in its place. |5 Take him (sic) asi one of the praised onesj who are |6 [following you (?), (namely)] the Lady of the House, Chantress of Bastetk, Tekhetl |7 [whom] Maat-Bastetm [has made] (or [daughter of (?)] Maat-Bastetm)”.
Another one, to be added to the above list, is a
The text inscribed on the Palermo scarab shows the traditional beginning of BD Ch. 30B. Then it introduces a variant, the sentences uttered by the gods who witness the weighing of the heart at the end of this chapter.31
A selection of those sentences is gathered by Seeber.32 Bacchi found a very similar wording on a coffin in Marseille, dating however from the Twenty-first Dynasty33 and with a considerably longer and more structured text (translation by G. Maspero):
Based on stylistic criteria, on paleographic details, and on the frequency of the owner’s title, we would consider for the dating of this scarab a period of time from the Nineteenth to the Twenty-second Dynasty; however, while at first the New Kingdom seemed a suitable and convincing proposal, the discovery of a parallel has come to suggest otherwise. In July 2020, Claude Laroche received from the Berlin Museum a number of photographs of unpublished heart-scarabs
2. Berlin Ägyptisches Museum und Papyrussammlung, inv. no. ÄM 34343
Dimensions: 56 x 38 x 20 mm; weight 78 g.
Material: dark green greywacke.
Provenance: not recorded; former Georges Michaelides collection, acquired by the Berlin Museum in 1973.37
This dark green scarab is of medium size, much smaller than the scarab at Palermo, and almost perfectly oval. The prothorax is separated from the elytra by a double U-shaped suture line, while the elytra themselves, which have no notches, are separated by a triple line. The clypeus with five indentations is framed by two large ovoid eyes, between which is engraved a pattern of three equilateral triangles nested within each other, which we have called a “triangular crown”. The sides of the scarab are cut by shallow grooves into three triangles decorated with hatching, representing the so-called type 2 legs (in Laroche’s terminology), while the hatched legs of the Palermo scarab, separated by deep grooves, belong to type 1.38 The base is inscribed similarly to the Palermo scarab, with a text arranged in a lunette and six lines. Here, too, the lunette shows Anubis as a recumbent jackal. Then come the first two canonical lines of Chapter 30B, followed by the same peculiar variant, although a little shorter, as seen above. The text is concluded by the titles and name of the owner, Shedsubastet, as well as, probably, the name of one of his parents, Maat-Bastet.
2.2 The text
The lunette only shows Anubis, and not the heart in front of the god as on the Palermo scarab. The figure’s caption fills the space in front of and above it.
“Anubis, who is in the embalming-placea”
Only three-and-a-half lines contain the beginning of BD Ch. 30B and the first phrases of the “variant”, then the titles and name of the owner. The text begins
“He says: – My ib-heart, (my) ib-heart of (my) mother – two times –, my haty-heart of (my) transformationsa! Come out to the Beautiful Placeb! – <He> shall be examined on the scales and he shall be found right <in> the Hall of the Double Justice c, (namely) the God’s Father, Master of Secrets,
2.3 Dating the Berlin scarab
The dating of heart scarabs, as Laroche argues,50 depends on about twenty plastic and epigraphic criteria, half of which relating to the text of Chapter 30B. None of these criteria are in themselves failproof evidence for a particular period, but they indicate a prevalence of a feature which also occurs over a wider span of time. Only the cooccurrence of several elements prevailing during the same period allow us to propose a date.
As for the Berlin scarab, its shape is comparable to that of a scarab coming from a rather well-dated archaeological context. The excavations of the Spanish mission in the Third Intermediate Period necropolis at Herakleopolis Magna, which at that time was governed by Libyans,51 brought to light five heart-scarabs inscribed with a few lines from the beginning of Chapter 30 B. In Fig. 4, the Berlin scarab of Shedsubastet is compared with one of these scarabs, i.e., that of an individual named Kehshasha,52 presently held in the museum of Cordoba. There is an evident plastic and graphic similarity between these two scarabs with hatched legs, designated “type 2” by Laroche. In addition, it is interesting to remark that the scarab of Kehshasha, too, is inscribed with the beginning of Chapter 30B followed by a different variant, exactly like some others of the five Herakleopolitan scarabs.
Moreover, we have already pointed out above that one of the two heart scarabs of Osorkon II of the Twenty-second Dynasty, held in the Brooklyn Museum,53 shows a peculiar decoration in the first register. It consists of large motifs occupying almost half the surface of the scarab, representing the goddess Maat, a phoenix and a fan. Like this royal one, our two scarabs in Palermo and Berlin show a large representation of Anubis in the first register. So far, we have found no other parallel for this feature.
In addition to these stylistic features, the owner’s titles are important dating clues: as we have seen, neither the title
So, although some features would tend to push the date further back in time (such as the number of suture lines 2/3, which is rather characteristic of the Ramesside period, but does occur even subsequently, according to Laroche’s research), the other arguments seem much stronger and an attribution to the Twenty-second Dynasty more likely.
2.4 Using the Berlin scarab for dating the Palermo one
The Berlin heart-scarab of Shedsubastet, therefore, is to be dated very probably to the Twenty-second Dynasty. It shares a number of features with the Palermo scarab, whose plastic characteristics would seem a priori to be rather from the New Kingdom. They are the only heart-scarabs known so far with the same figuration in the first register or lunette (with the single
It seems very probable that they belonged at least to the same family, as they were, moreover, both connected to the cults of Bubastis (although Bastet is worshiped throughout Egypt) and Per-Sopdu, less than 8 km away.
Therefore, we suggest for the Palermo scarab, too, a date to the Libyan Period (ca. 910-720 BC).
3. Mandralisca Museum, Cefalù, inv. no. 520
Dimensions: 47 x 28 x 16 mm; weight: 44 g.
Material: yellow-brown steatite, with traces of red pigment.
Provenance: not recorded; collection of Enrico Pirajno Baron of Mandralisca (Cefalù, 1809-1864).54
The oval-shaped scarab has schematic rectangular parallelepiped-shaped legs, decorated with a few roughly parallel lines separated by grooves of medium depth. The clypeus has four triangular indentations, one of which is chipped. The suture between the prothorax and the elytra, not decorated with notches, is rendered by a horizontal line and the suture between the elytra by a vertical line, which the sculptor has obviously made several attempts to draw. The lines form a very small triangle at their meeting point.
Inscribed on the base are the name and titles of the owner followed by the beginning of the first sentence of Chapter 30B of the Book of the Dead. The text is contained in four registers divided by hesitant, awkwardly drawn lines. The hieroglyphs were formerly colored with a red pigment which has weathered into brown but for a dot.55
3.2 Text on the base
On four lines, a hieroglyphic inscription that gives only the owner’s name and titles and a very short beginning of BD Ch. 30B:
“The Osiris Lady of the Housea, |2 Chantress of Amun-Re King of the Godsb, |3 Tadikhonsuc, justifiedd, who says: |4 – (My) ib-heart of (my) mother, (my) haty-heart of (my) mothere…”
This scarab shows the single-line sutures which are characteristic for the Third Intermediate Period, Twenty-first – Twenty-second Dynasty, also with that small triangle where they meet;60 many examples, a high number of which belong to temple personnel such as Chantresses or wab-Priests, share many features with this scarab, both stylistic features and peculiarities in the layout and selected parts of the incised text: usually, a very limited number of lines of Chapter 30B, the preamble with wsir and the absence of the sign of the seated figure after the name of the owner.61
All these features suggest as very likely a date to the early Third Intermediate Period, Twenty-first – Twenty-second Dynasty; on the base of the only comparison found for that very peculiar “shifting” of the
4.1 The discovery of the Palermo scarab
The scarab was reported to have been discovered on the rock after which the city of Cefalù was probably named, no more than a few months before March 1940, by Andrea Calderazzo, then a young high school student. This information and any other news and records are due to the late Prof. Rosario Ilardo, with whom Rosati got in touch at the end of 2018; he had succeeded in finding Calderazzo, then living in Piombino (Livorno), in 2004. Unfortunately, Calderazzo was not able then to recover his own records and could rely only on his memory. However, the letter he wrote to Rosario Ilardo on May 5th, 2004, is quite informative, despite the fact that he could not remember exactly when he had found the scarab, although he was certain it was in 1939 or 1940.62 Since direct news of such findings are rare, it is worth dwell briefly on the matter.
In that letter, Andrea Calderazzo wrote that in his teenage years he used to explore the Cefalù rock together with some schoolmates in search of small ancient objects:
It took some days to remove the incrustations from the object, but at the end the surprise was great. The news spread rapidly through the school. Giuseppe Li Vecchi, a teacher of history and philosophy and honorary inspector of the Italian antiquities service (Soprintendenza archeologica), examined the object and wrote an article on its discovery for the Giornale d’Italia.64
The scarab was left with the young boy’s father for safekeeping, who was subsequently asked to turn it over to the National Museum at Palermo. After a few months, the Minister of National Education Giuseppe Bottai granted him a reward of 10 liras, but he rejected it as incommensurate to the historical and artistic value of the object. A similar low estimate was made by Giulio Farina, the Director of the Egyptian Museum in Turin. Among the records collected by Rosario Ilardo is a copy of a confidential letter to Giuseppe Li Vecchi, signed by Jole Bovio Marconi, archaeological Superintendent for Western Sicily. She writes:
Certainly, Farina could not examine the scarab in person, and there were perhaps misunderstandings during the exchange of information. That letter bears the date of March 13th, 1940, and it is clear that the scarab was not yet in Palermo, but the Superintendent was expecting it.
The object was discovered, as its finder wrote in the letter, in an open area, on the ground surface, where it had probably been washed down. Thus, any different or indefinite or generic provenances that have been stated and repeated elsewhere should not be retained. Bacchi (n. 2) wrote “Castello Diana presso Cefalù”,66 as if it were in the outskirts of Cefalù, but the “castle” (Castello, which is also a general and popular name for the rock itself) is properly on top of the rock, dates from the 12th-13th century and has nothing to do with Diana, whose name is on the contrary associated with a so-called Temple of Diana (see below).
Another reported provenance is “a cave of the rock”:67 the finder admits in his letter that the numerous caves there were also sometime chosen for their explorations, but that was not the case when the scarab was found. The fact that this provenance is indicated by Bovio Marconi, so often in touch with the finder’s family, has however to be remarked.68
The only archaeological context mentioned by the finder, though to specify only that the scarab was “below” it (meaning of course that it was at a lower level on the slope of the rock, but on the same side, the western one), was the so-called Temple of Diana (Tempio di Diana), a popular and odd name for a megalithic building probably from the 5th-4th cent. BC, restored in the 2nd (?) cent. BC, which perhaps retained a function as a place of worship over the centuries (a cult of water? It is only a few meters away from a more ancient cistern), as well as a defensive function.69 The temple and the cistern are the only properly archaeological remains on the rock prior to the Byzantine age.
It cannot be excluded that the scarab was originally there, but neither can it be proved. Nowadays the area in front of the Temple of Diana is quite flat or only gently sloping, then it descends a little more steeply towards the medieval walls and is covered by grass and pine trees: on the contrary, until at least the Sixties of the last century the ground was completely treeless, as evidenced by old photos, and reforestation was actually decided in 1965. Rather close to the Temple, a settlement was built in the Byzantine period (whose warehouses and ovens are extant), and a church dedicated to St. Anne; the Temple itself became a church for St. Venera: therefore, the area has been frequented and occupied for a long period and is not absolutely undisturbed.
So, we can indicate as the provenance of the scarab only the Cefalù rock, not far away but at a lower level than the so-called Temple of Diana.
An investigation into why the scarab arrived there, brought by whom and when, is beyond the scope of this article. Since the discovery was not from a regular
It is worth mentioning that heart-scarabs have very rarely been found in archaeological sites outside of Egypt or Nubia, only five specimens to date, according to data gathered by Cl. Laroche: in addition to the two in Italy (one of which, Turin Suppl. 17133, entered the museum in 1853, coming from Tharros, as said above), a third one was excavated at Tell Jerisheh/Gerisa in Palestine in 1934,73 and two come from Cyprus, now at the British Museum as a gift by Robert Hamilton Lang in 1913. The latter two, however, EA 51856 and 51857, were more likely purchased in Cyprus, not excavated by Hamilton Lang himself, because no precise provenance is indicated.74
Therefore, one specimen only comes from a “real” archaeological context, at Gerisa, a short distance north of Jaffa on the Yarkon river: its context is described as a level that was completely destroyed by a violent conflagration, “sealed”, as it were, without architectural remains and datable to the Late Bronze Age; however, “as the excavation was made at the end of the tell, it is possible that this place served as a dump for the pottery fragments of various periods”.75 Here were found scarabs of different periods, faience amulets, a Babylonian cylinder seal, bronze objects, and “Philistine” and Cypriote pottery. As such, this context is not very indicative. It should also be noted that the place lies in an area where Egyptian strongholds have been identified and the presence of Egyptians was likely.76
4.2 Provenance of the Mandralisca scarab
The second “Sicilian” heart-scarab certainly belonged to the Baron of Mandralisca, as we have seen above, but nothing is recorded about its provenance: the Baron could have bought it,77 or received it as a gift. It is less likely that it could come from excavations, even at Cefalù itself, like many of the archaeological finds in the Mandralisca collection;78 or Lipari, where the Baron carried out excavations at Contrada Diana.79 Although his notebooks are no longer available and in contemporary archaeological reports there is no mention of other finds of Egyptian objects there, such as shabtis, the important finds from Lipari, presently in the Mandralisca Museum and in the Ashmolean Museum, Oxford, have been studied by several scholars80 and dated to a phase very close to the Cnidian foundation of Lipari. None of these scholars, however, have regarded the Tadikhonsu scarab as coming from this context.
Ägyptische Mumien – Unsterblichkeit im Land der Pharaonen, Stuttgart 2007.
Al-Abedine, Adel Zine, “Le titre du grand prêtre du dieu Sopdou
Bacchi, Ernesta, “Lo scarabeo del cuore di Thutmòse IV”, RSO 20 (1942), pp. 211–27.
Ballerini, Francesco, “Antichità egiziane nel Museo Civico di Como”, Bessarione 7 (1910), pp. 210–37.
Beinlich, Horst and Mohammed Saleh, Corpus der hieroglyphischen Inschriften aus dem Grab des Tutanchamun: mit Konkordanz der Nummernsysteme des ‘Journal d’Entrée’ des Ägyptischen Museums Kairo, der Handlist to Howard Carter’s catalogue of objects in Tut’ankhamun’s tomb und der Ausstellungs-Nummer des Ägyptischen Museums Kairo, Oxford 1989.
Ben-Tor, Daphna, Lo scarabeo. Il segreto della vita e il confine tra i mondi, Roma 2005 (Italian edition of The Scarab. A Reflection of Ancient Egypt, Jerusalem 1993).
Ben-Tor, Daphna (ed.), Pharaoh in Canaan. The Untold Story (Catalogue of the Exhibition, The Israel Museum, Winter–Fall 2016), Jerusalem 2016.
Bernabò Brea, Luigi, “Apporti egizi alla fondazione della Lipàra cnidia e sviluppo delle sue necropoli”, in: Umberto Spigo and M. Clara Martinelli (eds.), Dieci anni al Museo Eoliano (1987- 1996). Ricerche e studi (Quaderni del Museo Archeologico Regionale Eoliano 1), Messina 1996, pp. 95–101.
Boardman, John, The Greeks Overseas: Their Early Colonies and Trade, London 1964.
Bovio Marconi, Jole, “I monumenti megalitici di Cefalù e l’architettura preistorica mediterranea”, in: Atti del VII Congresso nazionale di storia dell’architettura, Palermo, 24-30 settembre 1950, Palermo 1955, pp. 213–21.
Buzov, Emil, “The Role of the Heart in the Purification”, in: Alessia Amenta, M. Michela Luiselli and Marta Novella Sordi (eds.), L’acqua nell’antico Egitto: vita, rigenerazione, incantesimo, medicamento. Proceedings of the First International Conference for Young Egyptologists (Italy, Chianciano Terme, October 15-18, 2003), Roma 2005, pp. 273–81.
Catalogue des signes hiéroglyphiques de l’Imprimerie Nationale. Deuxième édition, Paris 1873.
Ceruti, Sabrina and Anna Provenzali (eds.), Sotto il cielo di Nut. Egitto divino, Milano 2020.
Chappaz, Jean-Luc, Francesco Tiradritti and Marie Vandenbeusch (eds.), Akhénaton et Néfertiti. Soleil et ombres des pharaons (Catalogue de l’exposition, Musée d’art et d’histoire, 17 octobre 2008- 1er février 2009), Genève 2008.
Colin, Frédéric, Les Libyens en Égypte (XVe siècle a.C-IIe siècle p.C.). Onomastique et histoire. Diss. Université Libre de Bruxelles 1996 (tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-00120038).
Crisà, Antonino, “Lettera di Enrico Pirajno di Mandralisca a Karl von Estorff con notizie di scavi e ricerche numismatiche a Lipari ed acquisti antiquari a Tindari”, Lanx 4 (2009), pp. 146–55.
Cultraro, Massimo, “Documenti di culti funerari di origine egizia a Lipari in età arcaica. Una nota preliminare”, in: Anna Di Natale and Corrado Basile (eds.), Atti del XVIII Convegno di Egittologia e Papirologia – Siracusa, 20-23 settembre 2018 (Quaderni del Museo del Papiro XVII), Siracusa 2020, pp. 153–74.
Curto, Silvio, Storia del Museo Egizio di Torino, Torino 19903.
Daressy, Georges, Statues de divinitès : Nos 38001-39384 (CGC), I, Le Caire 1906.
Daressy, Georges, “Un groupe de Saft el Henneh”, ASAE 20 (1920), pp. 123–28.
Davoli, Paola, Saft el-Henna, archeologia e storia di una città del Delta orientale (Archeologia e storia della civiltà egiziana e del Vicino Oriente antico – Materiali e studi 6), Imola 2001.
De Angelis, Francesco, “Archaeology in Sicily”, Archaeological Reports 53 (2006–07), pp. 123–90; 58 (2012), pp. 123–95.
De Putter, Thierry and Christina Karlshausen, Les pierres utilisées dans la sculpture et l’architecture de l’Égypte pharaonique. Guide pratique illustré (Connaissance de l’Égypte ancienne 4), Brussels 1992.
Dolinska, Monika, “Small Head, Little Mystery”, in: Johanna Debowska-Ludwin, Mariusz A. Jucha and Piotr Kolodziejczyk (eds.), Aegyptus est imago caeli: Studies Presented to Krzysztof M. Cialowicz on his 60th Birthday, Kracow 2014, pp. 217–20.
Eaton-Krauss, Marianne, “The Original Owner of Egyptian Museum, Cairo JE 46600”, BES 19 (2015), pp. 225–36.
Edfou I/3 = Marquis de Rochemonteix and Émile Chassinat, Le temple d’Edfou, 19872.
Famà, M. Luisa, Ivana Inferrera and Pietro Militello (eds.), Magia d’Egitto. Mostre archeologiche e congressi in Sicilia, Trapani 2015.
Feucht, Erika, Pektorale nichtköniglicher Personen (ÄA 22), Wiesbaden 1971.
Gaber, Hanane, “Les scarabées de cœur à tête humaine à la lumière d’une variante de la pesée du cœur”, in: Jean-Claude Goyon and Christine Cardin (eds.), Proceedings of the Ninth International Congress of Egyptologists, Grenoble, 6-12 Septembre 2004 (OLA 150), Leuven-Paris-Dudley, MA 2007, pp. 743–48.
Gaber, Hanane, “Deux variantes de la scène de la psychostasie (chapitres 30 et 125 du Livre des Morts)”, RdE 60 (2009), pp. 1–16.
Gadot, Yuval, “The Late Bronze Egyptian Estate at Aphek”, Tel Aviv 37 (2010),
Gee, John, “Of Heart Scarabs and Balance Weights: A New Interpretation of Book of the Dead 30B”, JSSEA 36 (2009), pp. 1–15.
Germer, Renate, Mummies: Life After Death in Ancient Egypt, Munich-New York 1997.
Geßler-Löhr, Beatrix, “Zur Schreibung von
Giglio Cerniglia, Rossella (ed.), Il culto di Iside nel Mediterraneo tra Lilibeo e Alessandria d’Egitto. Atti del Convegno, Marsala, 13-14 maggio 2011, Pisa 2017.
Giveon, Raphael, “A Late Egyptian Statue from the Eastern Delta”, JARCE 12 (1975), pp. 19–21.
Gombert-Meurice, Florence and Frédéric Payraudeau (eds.), Servir les dieux d’Égypte. Divines adoratrices, chanteuses et prêtres d’Amon à Thèbes (Catalogue de l’exposition, Musée de Grenoble, 25 octobre 2018 – 27 janvier 2019), Paris-Grenoble 2018.
Guidotti, M. Cristina (ed.), La vita oltre la morte. Il corredo funerario nell’antico Egitto, Ospedaletto (Pisa) 2013.
Guidotti, M. Cristina and Enrichetta Leospo, La collezione egizia del Civico Museo Archeologico di Como, Como 1994.
Hornung, Erik, Das Totenbuch der Ägypter, Zürich 1979.
Ingoglia, Caterina, “La necropoli greco-romana di Lipari: storia degli scavi e prospettive di ricerca”, Sicilia Antiqua 4 (2007), pp. 49–64.
Jansen-Winkeln, Karl, Ägyptische Biographien der 22. und 23. Dynastie, Teil I: Übersetzung und Kommentar (ÄAT 8/1), Wiesbaden 1985.
Jansen-Winkeln, Karl, “Die Libyer in Herakleopolis Magna”, Orientalia 75 (2006), pp. 297–316.
Kaplony, Peter A., Siegel und Skarabäen in der Sammlung Georges Michaelides. Ägyptisches Museum und Papyrussammlung der Staatlichen Museen zu Berlin. Tafeln und Manuskript (Michael E. Habicht, Renate Siegmann eds.), Berlin 2016.
Laroche, Claude, “Les scarabées inscrits et autres amulettes de cœur de l’Égypte ancienne (présentation, corpus, critères de datation, caractéristiques, collections)”, PhD dissertation, Paris IV – Sorbonne, 06.12.2014 (theses.fr/2014PA040240), publication forthcoming.
Laroche, Claude, “Les scarabées inscrits et autres amulettes de cœur de l’Égypte ancienne”, EAO 85 (2017), pp. 21–34.
LGG = Leitz, Christian (ed.), Lexikon der ägyptischen Götter und Götterbezeichnungen, 8 vols. (OLA 110-116, 129), Leuven-Paris-Dudley, MA, 2002-2003.
Lorand, David, “Quatre scarabées de cœur inscrits à tête humaine”, CdE 83 (2008), pp. 20–40.
Martin, Geoffrey Thorndike, The Tomb of Hetepka and Other Reliefs and Inscriptions from the Sacred Animal Necropolis, North Saqqâra 1964–1973, London 1979.
Maspero, Gaston, “Les monuments égyptiens du Musée de Marseille”, RecTrav 36 (1914), pp. 128– 45.
[Meeks, Christine and Dimitri, and Gisèle Piérini], La collection égyptienne: guide du visiteur (Cahier du Musée d’archéologie méditerranéenne), Marseille 19952.
Miniaci, Gianluca, “The Incomplete Hieroglyphs System at the End of the Middle Kingdom”, RdE 61 (2010), pp. 113–34.
Niemeyer, Hans Georg, “Aegyptiaca im Mittelmeerraum: Handelsgut der Phönizier? Zur Beschreibung eines Problems in der archäologischen Forschung”, in: M. Giulia Amadasi Guzzo, Mario Liverani and Paolo Matthiae (eds.), Da Pyrgi a Mozia. Studi sull’archeologia del Mediterraneo in memoria di Antonia Ciasca, Roma 2002,
Nigro, Lorenzo, “Le residenze palestinesi del Bronzo Tardo – I modelli planimetrici e strutturali”, in: Contributi e Materiali di Archeologia Orientale VI, Roma 1996,
Nigro, Lorenzo and Francesca Spagnoli, Landing on Motya. The Earliest Phoenician Settlement of the 8th Century BC and the Creation of a West-Phoenician Cultural Identity in the Excavations of the Sapienza University of Rome – 2012-2016, Roma 2017.
Onstine, Suzanne Lynn, The Role of the Chantress (
Pérez Die, Maria del Carmen, “The Third Intermediate Period Necropolis at Herakleopolis Magna”, in: Gerard P.F. Broekman, Robert J. Demarée and Olaf E. Kaper (eds.), The Libyan Period in Egypt. Historical and Cultural Studies into the 21st-24th Dynasties: Proceedings of a Conference at Leiden University, 25-27 October 2007, Leiden 2009, pp. 303–26.
Pérez Die, Maria del Carmen and Pascal Vernus, Excavaciones en Ehnasya el Medina (Heracleópolis Magna): introducción general, inscripciones (Informes arqueológicos, Egipto 1), Madrid 1992.
Petrie, William Matthew Flinders, Scarabs and Cylinders with Names (BSAE, London 1917), reprint London 1974.
Poma, Luana, “Amuleti, scarabei e statuette ushabti”, in: M. Luisa Famà (ed.), Il Museo Regionale “A. Pepoli” di Trapani. Le collezioni archeologiche, Bari 2009, pp. 285–96.
Pons Mellado, Esther (ed.), La colección egipcia de la Real Academia de Córdoba, Córdoba 1998.
Purpura, Gianfranco, “Le cave di pietra della rocca di Cefalù”, Sicilia Archeologica 37 (1978), pp. 59–67.
Quirke, Stephen, “Two Thirteenth Dynasty Heart-Scarabs”, JEOL 37 (2001-2002), pp. 31–40.
Quirke, Stephen, Going Out in Daylight –
Rowe, Alan, A Catalogue of Egyptian Scarabs, Scaraboids, Seals and Amulets in the Palestine Archaeological Museum, Le Caire 1936.
Sagrillo, Troy L., “The Heart Scarab of King Shoshenq III (Brooklyn Museum 61.10)”, JEA 97 (2011), pp. 240–46.
Schön, Frerich and Hanni Töpfer (eds.), Karthago Dialoge. Karthago und der punische Mittelmeerraum – Kulturkontakte und Kulturtransfers im 1. Jahrtausend v. Chr., Tübingen 2016.
Schumacher, Inke W., Der Gott Sopdu, der Herr der Fremdländer (OBO 79), Freiburg–Göttingen 1988.
Seeber, Christine, Untersuchungen zur Darstellung des Totengerichts im Alten Ägypten (MÄS 35), Berlin 1976.
Sethe, Kurt, “Zur Geschichte der Einbalsamierung bei den Ägyptern und einiger damit verbundener Bräuche”, SPAW 1934, pp. 211–39.
Sfameni Gasparro, Giulia, I culti orientali in Sicilia (EPRO 31), Leiden 1973.
Sousa, Rogério, The Heart of Wisdom: Studies on the Heart Amulet in Ancient Egypt (BAR Int. Series 2211), Oxford 2011.
Spanò Giammellaro, Antonella, “I manufatti egiziani ed egittizzanti”, in: Lucina Gandolfo (ed.), Pulcherrima Res: Preziosi ornamenti dal passato, Palermo 2008, pp. 63–85.
Spiegelberg, Wilhelm, “Das Herz als zweites Wesen des Menschen”, ZÄS 66 (1931), pp. 35–37.
Sukenik, Eleazar Lipa, “Excavations in Palestine 1933-34 – Tell el Jerīshe”, Quarterly of the Department of Antiquities in Palestine 4 (1935), pp. 208–09.
Taylor, John H., “Judgement”, in: John H. Taylor (ed.), Journey Through the Afterlife. Ancient Egyptian Book of the Dead, London 2010, pp. 204–37.
Tullio, Amedeo, “Saggio sulla topografia e sulle antichità di Cefalù”, Kokalos 20 (1974), pp. 119– 51.
Tullio, Amedeo, La collezione archeologica del Museo Mandralisca, Cefalù 1979.
Tullio, Amedeo, “Cefalù”, in: Enciclopedia dell’Arte Antica Classica e Orientale, Secondo Supplemento 1971-1994, II, Roma 1995, pp. 90–93.
Tullio, Amedeo, “Presenze puniche nella necropoli ellenistico-romana di Cefalù”, in: Antonella Spanò Giammellaro (ed.), Atti del V Congresso Internazionale di Studi Fenici e Punici- Marsala- Palermo, 2-8 ottobre 2000, II, Palermo 2005, pp. 837–48.
Van Essen, Charles-Claude, “La date du sanctuaire mégalithique de Cefalù”, Mélanges de l’École française de Rome 69 (1957), pp. 45–48.
Verga, Silvana, “Scarabei e scaraboidi nel Museo Nazionale Pepoli di Trapani”, Sicilia Archeologica 40 (1979), pp. 27–36.
Virenque, Hélène, “Saft el-Henneh aux époques tardives: remarques sur la métropole et les sanctuaires de la XXe province de Basse Égypte”, CRIPEL 27 (2008), pp. 141–50.
Weightman, Brian and James K. Thompson, “The Heart Scarab of Nespaherentahat”, GM 249 (2016), pp. 165–69.
Yoyotte, Jean, “Prêtres et sanctuaires du nome héliopolite à la Basse Époque”, BIFAO 54 (1954), pp. 83–115.
Žabkar, Louis V., “Some Observations on T.G. Allen’s Edition of the Book of the Dead”, JNES 24 (1965), pp. 75–87.
- For their kind assistance and for authorization to use photographs, both authors wish to thank Francesca Spatafora, formerly Director of the Palermo Archaeological Museum, Caterina Greco, her successor, and their colleague Elena Pezzini; Augusto Purpura, President of the Fondazione Mandralisca, Vincenzo Cirincione, Secretary, and Maestro Sandro Varzi, at Cefalù; Olivia Zorn, Assistant Director, and Jana Helmbold-Doyé, Keeper of the Ägyptisches Museum und Papyrussammlung, Staatliche Museen zu Berlin; and M. Carmen Pérez Die, Chief Keeper of the Egyptian and Near Orient Antiquity Department of the Museo Arqueológico Nacional, Madrid.↑
- De Putter and Karlshausen, <i>Les pierres</i>, 1992, pp. 116–18.↑
- See the <i>Appendix</i> at the end for the surviving documentation on the discovery and the archaeological context.↑
- Bacchi, <i>RSO</i> 20 (1942), pp. 226–27, no photo of the second scarab. Its text translated in Malaise, <i>Scarabées de cœur</i>, 1978, p. 53.↑
- Laroche, <i>EAO</i> 85 (2017), p. 31 (figure updated 2020).↑
- Suppl. 17133, studied by Bacchi, <i>RSO</i> 20 (1942), pp. 211–25; she did not remark their similarity.↑
- Curto, <i>Storia del Museo Egizio</i>, 1990<sup>3</sup>, pp. 96 and 113; purchased in 1853 from Nicolò Musso along with other objects with the same provenance.↑
- Chappaz, Tiradritti, and Vandenbeusch (eds.), <i>Akhénaton et Néfertiti</i>, 2008, p. 269 no. 211: the text here is an offering formula, not the usual Ch. BD 30B. Cf. Milan E.1984.04.01, recently in Ceruti, Provenzali (eds.), <i>Sotto il cielo</i>, 2020, pp. 208-09 (late Eighteenth Dynasty); Israel Museum 76.018.0271, anonymous, attributed however to 7<sup>th</sup>–5<sup>th</sup> century B.C. in the Museum website (<a href="https://www.imj.org.il/">imj.org.il</a>), to the Late Period by Ben-Tor, <i>Lo scarabeo</i>, 2005, p. 108.↑
- Bruxelles E 8064, Malaise, <i>Scarabées de cœur</i>, 1978, p. 86 and pl. 8; Sennefer’s scarab, ibid., pl. 1.↑
- Acc. Nr. 86.226.22, vd. <a href="https://www.brooklynmuseum.org/opencollection/objects/4246">brooklynmuseum.org/opencollection/objects/4246</a>.↑
- Laroche, <i>EAO</i> 85 (2017).↑
- Feucht, <i>Pektorale nichtköniglicher Personen</i>, 1971, no. 91B, p. 86, Pl. XIII (Hermitage Museum; New Kingdom?). There is another heart-scarab, a bit smaller, that shows at the top of the base a sun disk flanked by cobras (?): MET 20.3.191, vd. <a href="https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/558319">https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/558319</a>.↑
- In rare instances, the traditional Ch. 30B inscribed on scarabs bears the title: <named-content content-type="traslitterazione">rA n ib n wsir</named-content> N, “Spell of the heart of the Osiris N”, e.g., BM EA24767: <a href="https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/object/Y_EA24767">britishmuseum.org/collection/object/Y_EA24767</a>, in this case written at the end of the text.↑
- Malaise, <i>Scarabées de cœur</i>, 1978, p. 50 with n. 6, with references dating from the New Kingdom and the Twenty-second Dynasty.↑
- On three out of the five King’s scarabs, Carter’s nos. 256a, 256q, 261m: Beinlich and Saleh, <i>Corpus</i>, 1989, resp. pp. 82–3, 88–9, 94–5.↑
- A very different interpretation of this initial part has been proposed, suggesting that <named-content content-type="traslitterazione">mwt</named-content> may be instead the balance weight (<i>Wb</i> II 55, 3): Gee, <i>JSSEA</i> 36 (2009). This hypothesis, however, remains moot: one may cite similar expressions where <named-content content-type="traslitterazione">mwt</named-content> is unequivocally “mother”, e.g., CT Spell 20 (<i>CT</i> I 56, es. B1P, B6C): “I gave you your <named-content content-type="traslitterazione">ib</named-content>-heart of your mother, your <named-content content-type="traslitterazione">HAty</named-content>-heart of your body”.↑
- Bacchi, <i>RSO</i> 20 (1942), p. 227: <named-content content-type="traslitterazione">prj <jr> br</named-content>, “uscito fuori (sottinteso: dal ventre di lei)”. Cf. <i>Wb</i> I 461, 5, also written <named-content content-type="traslitterazione">brw;</named-content> <i>Wb</i> I 519, 16.↑
- Malaise, <i>Scarabées de cœur</i>, 1978, p. 53.↑
- Spiegelberg, <i>ZÄS</i> 66 (1931); Žabkar, <i>JNES</i> 24 (1965), pp. 84–85; Buzov, in Amenta et al. (eds.), <i>L’acqua nell’antico Egitto</i>, 2005. Cf. also the variants of the Psychostasy scene where the deceased is weighed against his/her own heart: remarked already by Seeber, <i>Totengericht</i>, 1976, pp. 74–75; Hornung, <i>Totenbuch</i>, 1979, pp. 434–35; now fully examined by Gaber, in Goyon and Cardin (eds.), <i>Proceedings Ninth ICE</i>, 2007; Gaber, <i>RdE</i> 60 (2009). On the “personification” of the heart, as borne out by human headed heart-scarabs: Quirke, <i>JEOL</i> 37 (2001-2002); Lorand, <i>CdE</i> 83 (2008). Cf. also heart amulets with human heads: Sousa, <i>Heart of Wisdom</i>, 2011, pp. 21–27; Dolinska, in Debowska-Ludwin et al. (eds.), <i>Aegyptus est imago caeli</i>, 2014, pp. 217–20.↑
- <i>RSO</i> 20 (1942), p. 227: “Sia fatta elevare dalla tomba”.↑
- Examples of New Kingdom date in Faulkner, <i>CD</i>, p. 115.↑
- Laroche, "Scarabées inscrits", 2014, vol. I, pp. 568, 573.↑
- <i>Catalogue des signes hiéroglyphiques</i>, 1873<sup>2</sup>, no. 2914 to 2921.↑
- BM EA 64378 (Taylor, in Taylor [ed.] <i>Journey Through the Afterlife</i>, 2010, p. 226, no. 113; Quirke, <i>JEOL</i> 37 [2001-2002], p. 31) and Coll. Sofer, London (Lorand, <i>CdE</i> 83 , p. 29), both characterized by the “mutilation” of bird-signs, cf. Miniaci, <i>RdE</i> 61 (2010).↑
- Unless it is atop a rather triangular head, now in part abraded.↑
- Onstine, <i>Role of the Chantress</i>, 2005 (the original PhD dissertation, submitted in 2001 at the University of Toronto, is available online at: <a href="https://tspace.library.utoronto.ca/bitstream/1807/15398/1/NQ58632.pdf">https://tspace.library.utoronto.ca/bitstream/1807/15398/1/NQ58632.pdf</a>).↑
- Onstine, <i>Role of the Chantress</i>, pp. 27–31. Ten entries only are dated to periods after the Twenty-second Dynasty.↑
- Onstine, <i>Role of the Chantress</i>, p. 27.↑
- Onstine, <i>Role of the Chantress</i>, pp. 99–140, chart 7: Reference List.↑
- Fragmentary stela from the sacred animal necropolis at North Saqqara: Martin, <i>Hetepka</i>, 1979, p. 42 no. 130 and pl. 38.↑
- E.g., Taylor, in Taylor (ed.), <i>Journey Through the Afterlife</i>, 2010, p. 212; Faulkner, <i>Book of the Dead</i>, 1985, pp. 27–28. In the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Dynasties, in papyri and tombs, the Psychostasy scene is indeed the vignette for BD Ch. 30B, before it becomes characteristic for BD 125: Seeber, <i>Totengericht</i>, 1976, p. 76; Gaber, <i>RdE</i> 60 (2009); Quirke, <i>Going Out in Daylight</i>, 2013, pp. 99–100.↑
- Seeber, <i>Totengericht</i>, 1976, pp. 95–96.↑
- Coffin box of Khonsumes, Inv. 253/1; no. 53 in Maspero, <i>RecTrav</i> 36 (1914), pp. 134–35, text on the exterior of the box, “panneau de droite, vers les pieds”. Part of the scene in [Meeks, Piérini], <i>La collection égyptienne</i>, 1995, p. 36.↑
- Missing in Maspero’s text.↑
- Maspero is reading perhaps: .…<named-content content-type="traslitterazione">n tA</named-content> <<named-content content-type="traslitterazione">m</named-content>> <named-content content-type="traslitterazione">ib.f pr m</named-content>…etc.; a possibly preferable alternative is: <named-content content-type="traslitterazione">ib.f pr(.w) m</named-content>…↑
- “The <named-content content-type="traslitterazione">imy-xnt</named-content>-priest in the embalming-house”, cf. <i>LGG</i> VIII, p. 103, S.2, U.1.↑
- Kaplony had planned to study it, cf. Kaplony, <i>Siegel und Skarabäen</i>, 2016; the cast of this heart-scarab is shown on pl. 106, no. 2002.↑
- Laroche, "Scarabées inscrits", 2014, ch. VII.↑
- Malaise, <i>Les scarabées de cœur</i>, 1978, p. 25.↑
- Sethe, <i>Geschichte der Einbalsamierung</i>, 1934, p. 11*, K.↑
- Yoyotte, <i>BIFAO</i> 54 (1954), pp. 103–04; Davoli, <i>Saft el-Henna</i>, 2001, pp. 99–100; Al-Abedine, <i>CCE (S)</i> 21 (2016).↑
- <i>Edfou</i> I/3, p. 335.↑
- Montet, <i>Géographie</i> I, pp. 210–11; Davoli, <i>Saft el-Henna</i>, 2001, pp. 69–70; Virenque, <i>CRIPEL</i> 27 (2008), pp. 144–47.↑
- Same wording on a statue dated to the Twenty-second Dynasty, reported to have been bought at Tell Basta: Daressy, <i>Statues de divinités</i>, I, pp. 302–3, CG 39217; Jansen-Winkeln, <i>Ägyptische Biographien 1985,</i>, I, p. 303. Same date for the inscriptions of Cairo JE 46600, a New Kingdom statue group from Saft el-Henna, usurped and dedicated to Senwaset and his wife by their son: Daressy, <i>ASAE</i> 20 (1920); Davoli, <i>Saft el-Henna</i>, 2001, pp. 35–36; Virenque, <i>CRIPEL</i> 27 (2008), p. 144 n. 21 (original group dated to the time of Amenhotep III: Eaton-Krauss, <i>BES</i> 19 ).↑
- <i>Wb</i> IV 299. Under the jackal, a sign looking like an <named-content content-type="traslitterazione">n</named-content> is in place of the small shrine or other support for the God’s image, sometimes a <named-content content-type="traslitterazione">tA</named-content>-sign (Gardiner N16-17).↑
- Formerly CG 535, now in Jerusalem, Israel Museum No. 67.30.426: Giveon, <i>JARCE</i> 12 (1975).↑
- Names formed like this are mainly for men, cf. the examples quoted above from Ranke, <i>PN</i>.↑
- Should it be one sign only, it is similar, although not identical, to a <named-content content-type="traslitterazione">Hm</named-content>-sign, U36 (cf. in the line above), or to a <named-content content-type="traslitterazione">sA</named-content>, V17.↑
- Cf., tentatively, the appearance of <named-content content-type="traslitterazione">ib</named-content>, heart, + stroke as a single sign in the third line of the inscription of the scarab Lot 106 in the Bonhams auction on 25.04.2012, attributed to the late New Kingdom/Third Intermediate Period: <a href="https://www.bonhams.com/auctions/19961/lot/106/">bonhams.com/auctions/19961/lot/106/</a>. There is something similar on Kehshasha’s scarab, see below, Fig. 4.↑
- Laroche, "Scarabées inscrits", 2014, ch. VII; Laroche, <i>EAO</i> 85 (2017), figs. 3, 5, 6.↑
- Colin, <i>Les Libyens</i>, 1996, I, pp. 96ff.; Jansen-Winkeln, <i>Orientalia</i> 75 (2006); Pérez Die, in Broekman et al. (eds.), <i>The Libyan Period</i>, 2009.↑
- Pérez Die and Vernus, <i>Excavaciones en Ehnasya el Medina</i>, 1992, p. 69 doc. 46 fig. 26: the owner’s name, clearly not an Egyptian one, is said to be of possibly Libyan origin; Pons Mellado, <i>Collección egipcia</i>, 1998, inv. no. 1981/1/102, p. 69.↑
- Acc. Nr. 86.226.22, <a href="https://www.brooklynmuseum.org/opencollection/objects/4246">brooklynmuseum.org/opencollection/objects/4246</a>.↑
- It is featured in the inventory of the Mandralisca collections drawn up by Antonino Salinas in 1888 (information courtesy of Sandro Varzi, Cefalù), and hence certainly belonged to the Baron. See the <i>Appendix</i> at the end for a few notes about its provenance.↑
- Cf. Malaise, <i>Scarabées de cœur</i>, 1978, p. 50 and p. 82 no. 4.↑
- E.g. Malaise, <i>Scarabées de cœur</i>, 1978, p. 83 and pl. 9 (Bruxelles E.4232); also Petrie, <i>Scarabs</i>, 1917, pl. XLVII, 3, belonging to another <named-content content-type="traslitterazione">šmayt</named-content>, to be added to Onstine’s corpus (above, nn. 26-27); Glasgow Museum 1896-65(2), belonging to Nespaherentahat (Weightman, Thomson, <i>GM</i> 249 ); Florence Egyptian Museum inv. 1179 , belonging to Ankhefenkhonsu (Guidotti [ed.], <i>La vita oltre la morte</i>, 2013, p. 18 no. 12); Louvre N 2853 and E 3082, resp. for Djediset and Djeddjehutyiuesankh (Gombert-Meurice, Payraudeau [eds.], <i>Servir les dieux</i>, 2018, p. 95, Cat. 40b, 40c: both with the title <named-content content-type="traslitterazione">šmayt n imn</named-content>).↑
- Inv. no. ED 893: Guidotti and Leospo, <i>Collezione egizia</i>, 1994, p. 70, L1, pl. 12, 29 (the owner was an <named-content content-type="traslitterazione">iHyt n imn-ra</named-content>). Cf. also Ballerini, <i>Bessarione</i> 7 (1910), p. 219: the scarab was found <i>in situ</i> on the chest of the mummy, under her <i>cartonnage</i> case (inv. ED 1).↑
- Onstine, <i>Role of the Chantress</i>, pp. 29–31; during the Third Intermediate Period, only five women in her corpus of 252 did not serve Amun.↑
- Geßler-Löhr, <i>GM</i> 116 (1990).↑
- Laroche, <i>EAO</i> 85 (2017), p. 30; for both these characteristics, cf. Turin Museum C. 5999; Durham Oriental Museum EG1833; Leiden CI 209. Cf. also, for the single-line sutura, Darmstadt HLMD-A-2006-148 (<i>Ägyptische Mumien</i>, 2007, p. 146 no. 136); Hildesheim 1246 (Germer et al., <i>Mummies</i>, 1997, pp. 24–25).↑
- Laroche, "Scarabées inscrits", 2014, ch. VII ; Laroche, <i>EAO</i> 85 (2017), p. 30; in a few instances, also a somewhat rough workmanship. For parallels, see notes 56, 57, 60.↑
- Ilardo touched briefly upon some of the information he had gathered in his <i>L’eccelsa rupe. Studi, ricerche e nuove prospettive storiche sulla rocca di Cefalù</i>, Palermo 2013, p. 227. Calderazzo passed away in 2008. It is preferable to keep here the official version of a fortuitous find; however, it seems, from the statements of the finder himself, that “explorations” of the rock were at least repeated, by several people and with a specific purpose, not only to take a walk.↑
- “On one of these occasions, after it had been raining for a few days, (…) each one [<i>scil</i>. of the schoolmates] walking along one of the rivulets that ran downhill from the walls, below the Temple of Diana, my attention was drawn to a disk, as large as a coin, dark green in color”.↑
- We were unable to determine in which issue of this popular daily newspaper the article appeared.↑
- “The scarab is an authentic Egyptian object, but apparently it is worth little! The Egyptologist Prof. Farina says that such scarabs may be worth five–ten liras. However, he does not know exactly what material it is made of”. Although the words are clear, what is meant is perhaps not the market value but the reward up to a maximum of a quarter of the value granted under the provisions of Law 1089/1939 (concerning the protection of artistic and historical assets). 10 liras of the time were worth less than 9 euros, a very small sum.↑
- Retained in Sfameni Gasparro, <i>I culti orientali in Sicilia</i>, 1973, pp. 83–84, 231.↑
- Bovio Marconi, in <i>Atti del VII Congresso nazionale di storia dell’architettura</i>, 1955, p. 215.↑
- It cannot be excluded that the circumstances were less “peaceful” than what appears from the finder’s memories: the Superintendent is certainly very annoyed in the letter, where she comments that the boy’s father is ungrateful, because she could have seized the scarab for failure to report its finding. She may have been aware of other, different circumstances that can no longer be documented.↑
- Tullio, <i>Kokalos</i> 20 (1974), pp. 146–50; Van Essen, <i>Mélanges de l’Ecole française de Rome</i> 69 (1957); Purpura, <i>Sicilia Archeologica</i> 37 (1978), pp. 62–63; Tullio, in <i>Enciclopedia dell’Arte Antica Classica e Orientale, Secondo Supplemento</i>, 1995, p. 91.↑
- Tullio, in Spanò Giammellaro (ed.), <i>Atti del V Congresso</i>, 2005, pp. 837–39. For <i>aegyptiaca</i> in Western Sicily, in addition to Sfameni Gasparro, <i>I culti orientali in Sicilia</i>, 1973: Poma, in Famà (ed.), <i>Museo Regionale di Trapani</i>, 2009, and previously Verga, <i>Sicilia Archeologica</i> 40 (1979); Spanò Giammellaro, in Gandolfo (ed.), <i>Pulcherrima Res</i>, 2008; Famà, Inferrera and Militello (eds.), <i>Magia d’Egitto</i>, 2015; De Angelis, <i>Archaeological Reports</i> 53 (2006-2007) and 58 (2012); Giglio Cerniglia (ed.), <i>Il culto di Iside</i>, 2017; Niemeyer, in Amadasi Guzzo et al. (eds.), <i>Da Pyrgi a Mozia</i>, 2002; Schön and Töpfer (eds.), <i>Karthago Dialoge</i>, 2016. On the colony of Motya, cf. Nigro and Spagnoli, <i>Landing on Motya</i>, 2017. Cf. also: <a href="https://www.arcait.it/bibliografia/sicelioti-fenici-punici-siculi-sicani-elimi-2006-1850/">arcait.it/bibliografia/sicelioti-fenici-punici-siculi-sicani-elimi-2006-1850/</a> (by L. Cappelletti).↑
- Above, nn. 4 and 67.↑
- Sfameni Gasparro, <i>I culti orientali in Sicilia</i>, 1973, pp. 83–84, 231–32.↑
- Rockefeller Archaeological Museum, Jerusalem, no. 343114. The news of the first artifact of that type ever found in Palestine appeared in the Jewish Telegraph Agency of June 26, 1934. It is described in Rowe, <i>Catalogue</i>, 1936, pp. 152-53 no. 641, without a photo; text on twelve lines, the first two, with the name of the owner, perhaps intentionally abraded; text of BD Ch. 30B, dated to the New Kingdom, probably Nineteenth Dynasty. Rowe quotes from the excavator’s report that it was “associated with ‘Philistine’ pottery under fallen burnt-brick wall in Level III”.↑
- Hamilton Lang acquired many antiquities there and led excavations mainly at Dhali/Idalion and Pyla. BM EA51856, unpublished: <a href="https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/object/Y_EA51856">britishmuseum.org/collection/object/Y_EA51856</a>. Prob. Late Period; the text is not a regular BD “heart-chapter”. BM EA51857, unpublished: <a href="https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/object/Y_EA51857">britishmuseum.org/collection/object/Y_EA51857</a>: made of red jasper, dated to the New Kingdom, with the opening phrases of Ch. BD 30B for an individual named “May”.↑
- Sukenik, <i>QDAP</i> 4 (1935), p. 209.↑
- E.g, Nigro, in <i>CMAO</i> VI, 1996, p. 10; Gadot, <i>Tel Aviv</i> 37 (2010), with references: the destruction of the Egyptian centers there can be dated approximately to the late thirteenth – early twelfth century BC. A more general overview: Ben-Tor (ed.), <i>Pharaoh in Canaan</i>, 2016.↑
- He had many interests and a rich network of correspondents: e.g., Crisà, <i>Lanx</i> 4 (2009).↑
- Tullio, <i>La collezione archeologica</i>, 1979, pp. 14–15.↑
- Ingoglia, <i>Sicilia Antiqua</i> 4 (2007), p. 49, with references. After the Baron’s death, excavations were carried out in 1878-79 by Giuseppe Scolarici in a neighboring property.↑
- On the important Egyptian finds there, including a small <i>aryballos</i> with the cartouche of Apries, see Bernabò Brea, in Spigo and Martinelli (eds.), <i>Dieci anni al Museo Eoliano</i>, 1996; Cultraro, in Di Natale and Basile (eds.), <i>Atti XVIII Convegno</i>, 2020; previously, Boardman, <i>Greeks Overseas</i>, 1964, p. 144.↑